SAARC summit 2008 in Sri Lanka makes thousands homeless: Has South Asia not seen urban poverty?
Posted by Ajith on July 18, 2008
Sri Lanka is now categorized as a medium income country but it is no secret that a sizable section of population still lives below poverty line. According to UNDP statistics, 45% of Sri Lankan population lives less than US$ 2 a day (this means their spending for a day for food, shelter, clothes, transport, education etc., does not exceed Rs. 220) and 6% lives less than US$ 1 a day. It is inevitable that some of them live in urban areas, sometimes near city centers.
Urban poverty is not unique to Sri Lanka. Slums are seen in the cities of any developing country. Every South Asian country has its own share. In every Indian metro millions of people live in slums. They cannot afford proper sanitation facilities. Majority of them do not even have toilets. Though not a common sight in Colombo, mass public defecations are seen in many South Asian cities. Mumbai is so crowded that they say when a city train hits a person (which happens every day, it seems) the drivers don’t even stop. Even in Bangalore – claimed to be the high tech city in South Asia there are estimated number of 15,000 toilet cleaners who carry buckets of human refuse on their shoulders. That is the sad reality South Asia lives with.
So what is this big deal about ‘cleaning the city’ for the summit chasing off poor people from their homes? Whom are we trying to fool?
Are the leaders of our government so naïve that they assume other South Asian leaders have not witnessed urban poverty? Don’ they know these leaders, except President Gayoom of Maldives, come from countries with 30% of the population live in extreme poverty compared to Sri Lanka’s 6%. (US$ 1 per day) Colombo might have been a heaven compared to the places they come from. So why this attempt to make thousands of people unnecessarily suffer?
It is also customary now to use ‘National Security’ to justify any damaging act of the government. Some of the people who had been chased off from Glennie passes have been living for more than 50 or 60 years. If they had not been a security threat for all these days how come they are now? Have they been recruited by tigers overnight?
It is also funny that the demolition of houses and shops is not restricted to centre Colombo. Houses of poor people in areas like Kotte, Nawala, Battaramulla and Kaduwela too have been destroyed? Why? Do any of the SAARC leader visit Kaduwela? (20 km from city centre) Why these people were made to suffer unnecessarily?
For development purposes, relocation of human habitats sometimes becomes a dire need. For example, a land in the middle of the city might be required to construct a super market complex, so relocation of current occupants become necessary. It can be done, provided that those poor people not only get homes somewhere but their occupations are not disturbed. Even if they are given land to build homes, will it be of any use if the relocation disturbs their income? How they could find money to feed their children? Are there good schools to send their children?
Perhaps we should not ask these questions. The priority of any Mugabe type ruler is himself and his family. As long as his family could rob the national wealth they have no concerns what happen to the rest. Did Hitler ever worried about the Jew children’s’ education when they sent them to camps? Did Idi Amin ever worried about the welfare of the millions he cold blooded killed? Did Polpot think twice before he made half the population starve? More recently does Mugabe ever worries about what hardships his hunger for power brought to the people? So why should only Sri Lanka be different?
I only hope international journalists take note.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Battaramulla, Bhutan, India, Kaduwela, Maldives, National Security, Nawala, Nepal, Pakistan, poverty, SAARC, Sri Lanka, UNDP, urban poverty, war in Sri Lanka | No Comments »

































